On 10/7/06, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > jQuery.fn.reverse = function() {
> > > this.pushStack(this.get().reverse());
> > > return this;
> > > }
>
> > Nice. That is a better approach then just doing
> > jQuery.fn.reverse = [].reverse.
>
> I'm curious, what is the advantage of one approach over the other?
Since the first once uses jQuery's nice pushStack method, you can now
do (in a silly example):
$("div")
.reverse()
.addClass("test")
.end()
.find("p") ....
or even:
$("div").reverse(function(){
alert("All the divs, in reverse: " + this);
});
--John
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
