> I like it! Using the title attribute instead of XHR degrades much better
> (uh, it degrades at all). I have done something similiar for Plazes, not
> very mature, quick and easy. Maybe I'm going to switch, but I'd need a
> clickable tooltip (appears on click only).
>
> Maybe you will add that some time?
Something like this?
$("#container a").addClass("clickable").Tooltip({show: "onclick"});
> Is tabs a widget? I'd have to rename it to Tabs() ;-) But I don't like
> that not-yet convention. Having a little Java background uppercased
> class names represent a constructor to me... It is also harder to type in.
Stefan uses that in all his Interface stuff. After thinking about it again and
again (with lots of Java-Background), I thought it would be a nice way to show
the difference between "simple" methods and complex "widget" methods. Tabs
would be a widget, just like a Thickbox, a sortable table, accordion etc.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
