On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:17, John Resig wrote: > I'm almost inclined to agree. When planning out the structure for the > new documentation I realized that the 'Ajax' section was really more > of a "Design Methodologies/Cookbook" section, more than anything else. > Whereas the core dom/css is more of a toolset of functionality. > > That being said - Ajax functionality is used a lot. If it were > extracted, I'd want to have a special jquery+ajax build to go along > with it.
I see nothing wrong with multiple "standard" builds for those not up to building their own compressed libraries. "Core" - Minimal stripped version "Standard" - More or less what it is now, including Ajax "Advanced" - Throw in some of the more useful plugins (by some definition of useful, but probably including the forms handling stuff and dimensions and possibly Interface; I leave this to others to figure out). Or Build Your Own! - Link to instructions on how to roll your own cherry-picked compressed library. 80% of people will just grab Standard, those that are very size conscious will get Core, those who like lots of bells and whistles for no effort get Advanced, and heavy-duty developers will build to order. Excuse me while I go back to lurking. :-) -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
