> I still think that using a namespace and providing a short cut like $A > is the best way to handle this, instead of extending the element or > prototype. I think we could even get chaining to work properly if we > really wanted too. We could also probably provide a way to extend the > prototype if users really wanted it.
I'd really like to hear other's opinions about this topic. John? Mike? Klaus? If you read this: Say something! I think jQuery is a lot about promoting best practice. Find the best approach for a certain aspect and promote that approach, instead of providing every way and as much flexibility as you can think of. The latter used to happen a lot in the java enterprise enviroment and is pretty ugly. It's great to have to opportunity to discuss it here at expense :-) -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
