> I always thought the point of the MIT was that it can be used with > anything, it is definitely compatible with GPL (so the dual license > for Drupal integration doesn't make sense to me) - the only > requirement is to keep the license intact (so the author gets credit). > I've seen downloads with different parts under different licenses, but > does source code distribution imply that *all* the code is under the > same license, regardless of the folder?
I'm no expert for lincenses. But I remember that jQuery had to be dual-licensed to allows the Drupal guys to integrate jQuery into their core. Dunno why that was necessary or what the idea is behind it. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- "Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht! _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
