I'll agree with that as well. These days, a few extra K is nothing. I'd much rather have it be blazing fast, even at the cost of it's ultra-lightweight file size.
<!----------------//------ andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --------------//---------> -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Delmarter Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:28 PM To: 'jQuery Discussion.' Subject: Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov I agree - speed is probably my main concern, not a few Kb file size. Regards, Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Aaron > Sent: Friday, 17 November 2006 8:24 a.m. > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov > > On 11/16/06, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The only thing I disagree with is the importance of > winning the size war. > > > > Up to this point all the emphasis has been on code size. At > some point > > we may want to look at speed, even if it makes the code > bigger. One example: > > When you say $(".myclass") the following things happen: > > I'm glad to see speed being brought up! > > -- > Brandon Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
