> I still see dangers with that. IE doesn't support overrideMimeType, so > if you don't want to leave it in the dust and want xml, you have to > serve as text/xml anyway. Furthermore I see people trying to make it XML > while it is HTML really and probably not well-formed. Instead of doing > it the right way in the beginning. I'd say MIME type matters, nothing else. > > Maybe I just can't imagine a situation where this is useful.
The situation where the user is sending XML to the browser but is sending the wrong headers (either intentionally, or not). I didn't realize that overrideMimeType didn't exist in IE, though. So it sounds like users will just have to tough it out for now. --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
