Brandon Aaron wrote: > On 12/9/06, Brice Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Glen Lipka wrote: >> >>> I didn't analyze the whole thing, but just a quick question: >>> Have you considered using the fadeTo() function? it works better >>> than messing with the opacity in the CSS. >>> >>> Glen >>> >>> >> In jQ 1.0.3 + you can also use $('#el').css('opacity',0.5); which is >> similar to $('#el').fadeTo(1,0.5); except that it doesn't give the >> element layout to make it compatible with $.anim() routines. The css >> opacity method doesn't allow you to fade over time, however -- though it >> is "cleaner" IMO. >> > > Anytime you set the opacity of an element in IE, the element is given layout. > > -- > Brandon Aaron True.. but I'm not refering to the "has layout" IE attribute -- more so to the "box layout" it seems to apply. E.g. try using $.fadeTo() / $.hide()+$.show() or any of the other functions which call the $.anim() functions on an inline element. It won't be inline for long? :)
~ Brice _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/