That's a very fair point, Jörn. And it is true about php.net's examples. I'll start improving the documentation once I understand jQuery a little more, I've only been working with it for less than a month, and only as my work demands it.
I'll also aim to answer questions, if I can, even if my answers aren't complete, in the hope that more experienced users can add more in depth detail, or correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks for your points. On 1/23/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Eastwell schrieb: > To be fair, I think the jQuery API documentation is sorely lacking, > when compared to say, php.net <http://php.net> (I know they're not on > the same scale, but e.g. the ability to comment documentation and add > additional examples is very useful.) The current wiki based API documentation allows everyone to register and activley improve the documentation. The problem with php.net's documentation is the lack of quality and examples and the start of each function. Too often, you have to crawl to (sometimes years old) comments to find what you are looking for. So instead of just commenting, help by improving the documentation itself. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Daniel Eastwell Portfolio and articles: http://www.thoughtballoon.co.uk Blog: http://www.thoughtballoon.co.uk/blog
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
