Sam Collett schrieb: > On 25/01/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But if you want something that does a lot more, than why would you be using >> ThickBox in the first place? There are plenty of other lightboxes out there >> with bells and whistles you can blow to your hearts content. ThickBox is >> the lightweight, 'One box to rule them all' solution. Keep it simple, and >> keep it small, >> http://codylindley.com/Javascript/257/thickbox-one-box-to-rule-them-all as >> it was intended to be . >> >> Adam >> > > > You keep a simple core, but it would be nice if other developers could > use Thickbox as a base for their 'own bells and whistles'. Get a good > solid base for others to build on, rather than them needing to do > their own from scratch (so they don't need to work out how to centre > on the page, overlay page content, resize images etc). > > e.g. > > In your html page add thickbox: > <script type="text/javascript" src="thickbox.js"></script> > > And add the class 'thickbox' to anything you want to show in one. > > Want it to look better (like adding transparency or transitions)? Just > include another script: > <script type="text/javascript" src="thickbox-addon-fancy.js"></script> > > No need to change your JavaScript (or even know JavaScript). > > Like you say - 'one box to rule them all'. If developers want to have > something else thickbox isn't a choice. Having it modular means that > they can use it without going somewhere else and needing prototype or > changing a lot of code. > Absolutely! Though I'm always suspicious about "no need to know javascript" :-)
-- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
