> file where one of the elements attributes is "for," which in my case will > help the end user know what the 'txt' attr is for in the design/flow of the > site and the naming convention was totally arbitrary. So, in my instance, > when I call .attr('for') i get 'undefined', but if I change the attribute to > 'whatfor' in the xml file and then call with .attr('whatfor'); it spits back > the value of the attribute. Other then for a label tag, I am not sure where > else the 'for' attribute is used for. I can toss up a test page if needed.
There's a few attr names you'll want to stay away from for xml docs: for, class, float, opacity. jQuery has special handling for these to fix common mistakes and browser inconsistencies. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/