On 2/21/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter De Berdt schrieb: > >> 1) Are you using Rails? > > > > Yes, close to 24/7 :-) > > > >> 3) Would you prefer an approach that generated JS by writing Ruby helpers > >> that generated jQuery code, or an approach that made is easier to link up > >> existing jQuery code into Rails? > > > > A mix of both actually, it would be great if I could just replace > > Prototype/scriptaculous with jquery/interface and I wouldn't have to > > replace my Rails helpers with Javascript code (I prefer to use Rails > > helpers for the simple stuff and resort to custom JS code if the Rails > > helpers are not sufficient). The Rails helpers are really great for > > the day-to-day stuff, but they don't encompass the complete > > functionality of Proto/script. > > This is *exactly* what I'm after - combined with the idea of UOJS, that is.
Indeed, but considering jQuery users already being used to UOJS, I didn't mention it, it seemed obvious to me :-) _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
