You're right, it is a good thing, but the artificial delay will only be about 1/2 a second max. So I figure that's not too bad of a compromise to make things look a bit better.
If it were a site for someone else, then I'd definitely choose function over form. :) malsup wrote: > >> link has been clicked previously. It seems like Internet Explorer checks >> it's cache to see if it has a copy of the ajax request already, which >> means >> it shows it straight away without any delay. > > Isn't that a good thing? Why impose an artificial delay? > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Event-%3EAJAX-wait-before-animation-completes-tf3412929.html#a9522109 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
