Isn't it invalid Xhtml, not invalid html? There has been a whole slew of expandos posts that say its basically fine for most primitive uses.
However, check is a particularly wierd one because "checked" *is* a valid one and this makes it confusing. So you might need to put a value in your "check" expando. Like check="blank". (Get it, -blank check-) If needed you could always filter those out. What is the case if you put like <input rel="" /> And search for rel. In this case, it is perfectly valid XHTML. If it doesn't find it there, maybe it's a bug. Because it should. Gle On 3/19/07, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recommend avoiding invalid HTML. --Erik On 3/19/07, Magnús Örn Gylfason < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm having a bit of a problem with the attribute selector in jquery. > Given html like: > > <form> > <input name="one" type="text"/> > <input name="two" type="text" check/> > <input name="three" type="text" check="bla"/> > </form> > > my javascript > > $( "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", form).each( function() { } ); > > will only find "three", but not "one" (which I do not want to find) or > "two" (which I do want to find). > > Am I misunderstanding something here? > > cheers, > Magnús Örn Gylfason > > btw, using JQuery 1.1.2 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/