Thanks, Brandon. I think I used each() because there were multiple elements. For some reason I didn't trust that all elements of both types would be handled properly without it. Nice to know I don't need it, though. I'll added to my code and then update the post.
On 3/22/07, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to jQuery! > > The code example where you use the .each can be written like this: > > $('[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]') > .click(function() { return false; }) > .css({ cursor: 'default', textDecoration: 'none' }) > .focus(function() { this.blur(); }); > > That is part of the huge benefit of chaining. jQuery will apply the > methods to all the elements matched by the selector. Also blur() is a > method of the element itself. So instead of doing this: > > $(this).blur(); > > Which says, give me a jQuery object and then fire the blur event of > the element, you can do this: > > this.blur(); > > Which only says, fire the blur event of the element. > > -- > Brandon Aaron > > On 3/22/07, Rob Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a new jQuery user and just took it for a spin on a site I've taken > > over. I blogged my first "use case" if anyone's interested. Nothing > > revolutionary, just examples (and code samples) of how jQuery saved me > > a lot of time and effort. > > > > http://musetracks.instantspot.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/3/22/jQuery-isSmooth > > > > I'm sure I didn't use the most efficient means available, so I'd > > appreciate any feedback. > > > > Rob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jQuery mailing list > > discuss@jquery.com > > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/