Dear Miguel, Dear Enric, I think that Miguel should send a draft of his proposed modifications and it can be validated/amended by editorial board members without need of a meeting. That would allow to at least correct quickly the misleading information, and we can start a sound discussion on other points on which there is no consensus.
Best, Loïc On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Miguel Colom <co...@cmla.ens-cachan.fr> wrote: > Quoting Enric Meinhardt-Llopis <enric.meinha...@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>: > > Dear all, >> >> You are talking about major changes to IPOL here. Should we summon >> the whole editorial board to approve these changes? (arrange a >> meeting, or send a mail to everybody with a poll to explicitly accept >> each of the changes) >> >> Maybe not all the people in the editorial board are reading this >> mailing list, or maybe they are not reading it this week. >> >> I want to have a voice in these changes but I'm not sure that this >> mailing list reaches everybody. >> > > Dear Enric, > > I think that to remove the false information in the IPOL pages (Software > Guidelines, FAQ, help, etc.) is urgente and should be done now. Some of > that false claims are that we don't support MATLAB, among others. We > wouldn't be deciding anything new, but just correcting the docs. > > About summoning all the Editorial Board or emailing them, as you wish. > My opinion is that we should be way more agile, in the sense that if we > detect that our information is false, that we can improve it quickly, and > someone has already taken the responsibility to do it, then it should be > done immediately. > > I'm afraid that if we don't be that agile, most of the time things won't > be done at all because we'll be waiting for eventual discussions that won't > ever happen and in the worst case this wait will block the actions. > > My proposal is to simply update the docs and to rearrange some parts (move > the C/++ to a dedicated part). > > Given said that, if you really think that it's necessary that all the > Editorial Board votes, let's do that then. I'm not opposed at all. > > Best, > Miguel > > > > >> Best, >> Enric >> >> >> >> 2017-07-04 16:10 GMT+02:00, Jose Luis Lisani <joseluis.lis...@uib.es>: >> >>> I agree with Miguel suggestions about the Submission Procedure and the >>> Software Guidelines. >>> I can update the information appearing in the web page, but first we >>> should all agree in the new guidelines. >>> >> -- >> IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/ >> >> contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/ >> news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/ >> announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/ >> discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/ >> >> > > > -- > IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/ > > contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/ > news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/ > announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/ > discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/ >
-- IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/ contact e...@ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/ news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/ announces annou...@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/ discussions discuss@list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/