have you run ldap_cachemgr -g ?

jadams@jadlaptop:~$ /usr/lib/ldap/ldap_cachemgr -g

cachemgr configuration:
server debug level          0
server log file    "/var/ldap/cachemgr.log"
number of calls to ldapcachemgr       1179

cachemgr cache data statistics:
Configuration refresh information:
  Configured to NO REFRESH.
Server information:
  Previous refresh time: 2014/09/08 13:19:03
  Next refresh time:     2014/09/08 14:44:23
  server: 127.0.0.1, status: UP
Cache data information:
  Maximum cache entries:          256
  Number of cache entries:          0



On 8 September 2014 13:32, Vern Bingham <[email protected]> wrote:

> Indeed, the Illumos ldapsearch command is definitely not the OpenLDAP
> homonym which, by the way, works in TLS/SSL with my OpenDJ server...
>
> I can also link in TLS/SSL to the OpenDJ server with Apache Directory
> Studio (which, I believe, is quite lenient with SSL).  (I have not tried
> with JXplorer...)
>
> My REAL problem is to make the ldap_cachemgr work with the OpenDJ server
> in TLS/SSL. I am only interested in ldapsearch to debug my problem...
>
> V.
>
>
> On 8 Sep 2014, at 14:10, Jonathan Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> okay, the "ldapsearch" command is not the OpenLDAP "ldapsearch command"
> (compare the help output and you'll see that they're different)
>
> I use OpenLDAP for our server, so that works well (I couldn't stand the
> absolutely humongous LDAP servers that were available ... L is supposed to
> stand for Light-weight ...)
>
> you could try compiling the OpenLDAP ldapsearch command and testing with
> that, however that wouldn't test the entire system integration ...
>
> Can you link to the OpenDJ with JXplorer? does that allow you to view/work
> with the system?
>
> Jon
>
> On 8 September 2014 12:54, Vern Bingham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I used to run an OpenDS server which I replaced with an OpenDJ server.
>> Since then, connections from LDAP client utilities in SSL/TLS stopped
>> working. Connections in the clear on port 1389 work just fine. Server-side
>> logs are not informative. I wish to see what is (not?) happening from the
>> client side.
>>
>>
>> On 8 Sep 2014, at 13:41, Jonathan Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have the same issue, but I hadn't realised because I always run the
>> debug from the server side.
>>
>> What issues are you having? What do you need to find out?
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On 8 September 2014 12:15, Vern Bingham via illumos-discuss <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> In my distribution of Illumos, the LDAP utilities were not compiled with
>>> the LDAP_DEBUG option:
>>>
>>>         $ ldapsearch -d 7 [...]
>>>         compile with -DLDAP_DEBUG for debugging
>>>
>>> In order to solve this problem, I downloaded the Illumos source and
>>> built it with -DLDAP_DEBUG in the LOCFLAGS in usr/src/lib/libsldap/
>>> Makefile.com <http://makefile.com/>.
>>>
>>> As a consequence, it is now possible to use the -d argument for
>>> ldapsearch but... it makes no difference!
>>>
>>> What have I missed?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------
>>> illumos-discuss
>>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
>>> RSS Feed:
>>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/23508059-3f15f76a
>>> Modify Your Subscription:
>>> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to