I'm interesting in hearing any war stories involving sites having loaded
servers with thin clients (not necessarily SunRays) comparing FSS as
opposed to TS(IA) scheduling with the SolarisIA (Interactive) extension
in Xorg.
If I understand correctly, setting FSS defeats totally SolarisIA, and
that SunRays typically had a best-practice of setting a project per
user, each with his own proj.cpu-shares to take advantage of the
specificities of FSS (Fair Share Scheduler).
Apparently on SmartOS, FSS is the design center, and from I read about
the "forkbomb", it seems like a reasonably safe approach for production.
Is there a perception preference either way and what about measurements?
Input device (mouse/kbd) performance?
Xvnc?
Thought this was rather odd (on an OI system with FSS as default) using
ConsoleKit to launch, priority '1', that is:
richard@smicro:~$ ps -cafeZ |grep vnc |grep -v grep
global noaccess 1367 1985 FSS 1 nov. 06 ? 9:38 /usr/bin/Xvnc
-inetd -query localhost -once securitytypes=none
global noaccess 18331 1985 FSS 1 15:08:17 ? 4:28 /usr/bin/Xvnc
-inetd -query localhost -once securitytypes=none
-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
