Yes. GPL is a total nonstarter for integration. Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Adam Števko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I wanted to ask older members of the community few questions: > > 1) Fuse is fully working on illumos, but the kernel module is not present in > vanilla illumos-gate. I wanted to ask on a short history of fuse in > OpenSolaris/early illumos days. Why it wasn’t never integrated? > 2) Are there any technical or political reasons why fuse shouldn’t be in > gate? The source > (https://github.com/jurikm/illumos-fusefs/blob/master/kernel/fuse_kernel.h) > is CDDL-licensed Only single file seems to have mentions of GPL > (https://github.com/jurikm/illumos-fusefs/blob/master/kernel/fuse_kernel.h). > Can that be a strong reason why fuse shouldn’t be integrated? I’d like a > simple answer what should gate contribution look like license-wise. > 3) tun/tap driver is pretty common (used mostly by OpenVPN). It would help, > if tuntap (https://github.com/kaizawa/tuntap) was a part of the gate itself. > However, tuntap seems to be fully GPL-licensed. Is this a blocker for > integration? > > Cheers, > Adam > > — > PGP Fingerprint: 00EF 547B 63CC 8FB0 02F4 C654 6843 7E0C F3E7 FCC1 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > illumos-discuss > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/22003744-9012f59c > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
