You neglect to mention your test platform's kernel or userland version
- are you running the latest illumos head, the stock kernel+userland
provided by OpenIndiana/Nexenta of some version, etc, etc?

I know that the Bulldozer family is a strange beast, and a few commits
related to them have made it into illumos recently, though I don't
know of any that would make a difference for your purposes.

- Rich

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is the implementation of Illumos user-space locks known to take an
> abnormally long time on the Opteron 6200 ("Interlagos", "Bulldozer") CPUs?
>
> The reason why I ask is that 'prstat -L -m' shows that a massive amount of
> my OpenMP-threaded application's time is being spent in user-space locks.
>  For example, 30% to 90%.  When time spent in locks is indicated to be high,
> then the performance is terrible.
>
> While I am running a benchmark and there is just one OpenMP thread allowed
> to be running, I am seeing as much as 25% of the time being spent in locks.
>
> These issues are being noticed when there is quite a lot of data to process
> and therefore quite a long time between acquiring locks. Locks should not be
> held more than a few microseconds.
>
> Performing the same test on a quad-core Opteron system running Solaris 10
> reports about 0.1% of the time being spent in locks.  With four cores
> enabled on the Opteron 6282 SE, about 17% of the time is reported to be
> spent in locks, and this is for a "good" algorithm.
>
> On the quad core Opteron system, the Dtrace Toolkit's lockbyproc.d shows
> that my program spent 95,166 nanoseconds (0.00009516s) in locks for a test
> duration of 33.16s.  This is what lockbydist.d says about the time
> distribution of the locks:
>
>  gm64Q16
>           value  ------------- Distribution ------------- count
>            8192 |                                         0
>           16384 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@                           5
>           32768 |@@@@@@@@@@@                              4
>           65536 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@                           5
>          131072 |                                         0
>
> My application seems to be properly designed.
>
> Ideas?
>
> Bob
> --
> Bob Friesenhahn
> [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> illumos-discuss
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
> RSS Feed:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21253829-71dc39ef
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to