On 09/17/2012 05:28 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
> with the advent of Windows Server 2012, we have Microsoft directly attacking 
> storage solutions.
> And I already faced some "win" people talking like "We don't need zfs 
> anymore, everything will be
> rfs now that we have Windows Server 2012".
> What are your thoughts about their "rebranded zfs"? The Resilient File System?
> What are the arguments we can use to prompote zfs against rfs? (if any...).
> Just brainstroming...
> Gabriele.

While it is tempting to descend into bashing on a list with mostly
favorable posters, I will try to maintain as much as objectivity as I can.

ReFS, from the limited information that is available, roughly
corresponds to ZFS's SPA and lower layers. As such, it inherits the
upper NTFS layers with support for file compression, encryption, sparse
files, links, quotas, etc. This approach is interesting, but at as it
stands at the moment, ReFS has quite a long way to go before it can be
said to approach ZFS in terms of feature-completeness. To my knowledge,
parity RAID support is very limited and there's no support for any kind
of tiered storage, dedup, writable-snapshots, layered filesystem
objects, volume objects, booting off of ReFS volumes, etc. Another
important fact is that ReFS is new. Filesystems are extremely complex
codebases which require very a careful approach, or "Bad Things(tm)"
happen (i.e. data loss), so admins tend to be very careful in trying out
new stuff in production. Lastly, ZFS has tons of runtime experience
behind it, lots of knowledge in the community on how to tune it and how
to handle problems. Over time, this will be built for ReFS, but it is a
slow and painstaking process (aptly described by Bryan Cantrill as
"walking the trail of tears").

Cheers,
--
Saso


-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to