On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Gabriele Bulfon <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not a backup server, it's a server sending it's own pool to an iscsi > remote disk, mounted locally. > So, if I need to check it's data, I have to mount it, but I don't want its > sharings. zfs set canmount=noauto mybackup/replica -- richard > > Gabriele. > > > > > > Da: Geoff Nordli <[email protected]> > A: [email protected] > Data: 21 novembre 2013 21.28.24 CET > Oggetto: Re: [discuss] zfs import -N not persistent, and ways to mount with > no share > > > On 13-11-21 11:06 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> following my recent posts about the issues I had, I ask this: >> >> - Issuing a zfs import -N (no mount, no share) and rebooting, mounts the >> pool without -N, so with >> mounting and sharing. Shouldn't it persist my idea of having the pool >> without mounting and sharing >> on reboot? >> >> - What if I need to import a pool and mount it without any dataset share? If >> that pool is a replica of >> the living/sharing-smb pool, it will lead you to unwanted results, sharing >> the replica over the network >> with the limits of smb, so you never know what users are mounting...You may >> need to mount it to >> check files into it, without having it shared. >> >> > > If it is a backup server, what about firewalling the ports to restrict SMB? > > Geoff > > illumos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription > > > illumos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription -- [email protected] +1-760-896-4422 ------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
