All,

Unless I am missing something, 

      dladm create-aggr -l nic0 -l nic1 -l nic2 -l nic3 -L <active,passive> 
aggr0

works just fine in the two switch configuration.   It's been our experience, 
that the two
switches need to look like they are one switch (e.g. cluster switch) to make it 
work.

Cheers,
Michael

On May 29, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Darren Reed via illumos-discuss 
<discuss@lists.illumos.org> wrote:

> On 27/05/2014 11:41 PM, Richard Elling via illumos-discuss wrote:
>> ...
>>> What we want, is to have CIFS to be accessible on the lan through the 4 
>>> phys cards, with two double paths
>>> over the 2 switches.
>>> If possible, the 2 double paths should work as 4 paths when everything is 
>>> ok, and not just 2 alternative
>>> paths in failover mode.
>> This is not possible to do this using DLMP or IPMP and have all 4 paths 
>> carrying
>> load. The only way to do that is to have a 4-way aggregation across both 
>> switches (with
>> or without IPMP) and choose the best load balancing policy to spread the 
>> workload across
>> multiple clients.
> 
> If I were to translate that into Cisco speak, it would be a LACP VPC of 4 
> links, 2 on each switch going to 4 ports on the server that bonded all four 
> ports into a single LACP interface?
> 
> Darren
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> illumos-discuss
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21482476-185767cb
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
  • [discuss] DLMP aggr Gabriele Bulfon via illumos-discuss
    • Re: [discuss] ... Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
      • Re: [discu... Gabriele Bulfon via illumos-discuss
        • Re: [d... Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
          • Re... discuss
          • Re... Darren Reed via illumos-discuss
            • ... michael.sp...@pluribusnetworks.com via illumos-discuss
              • ... Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
            • ... Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
          • RE... Robert Milkowski via illumos-discuss
            • ... Richard Elling via illumos-discuss

Reply via email to