One of my other interests is sustainability. So I thought I would take a look at what https://www.websitecarbon.com/ thought of some of the websites associated with the project - just the home page of each.
tribblix.org - A+ - 0.00g CO2 per visit (actually 0.002g, I think) better than 100% of all websites openindiana.org - A+ - 0.01g CO2 per visit better than 99% of all websites illumos.org - A+ - 0.04g CO2 per visit better than 96% of all websites smartos - A - - 0.17g CO2 per visit better than 83% of all websites omnios.org - B - 0.28g CO2 per visit better than 69% of all websites oxide - C - 0.38g CO2 per visit better than 61% of all websites The methodology is pretty suspect, but overall we're a lot better than most of the websites out there. In isolation, you can't take the numbers too seriously, but they provide food for thought. Both the omnios and oxide scores are pulled down by not being hosted someplace that uses a renewable source of electricity (at least, so far as websitecarbon can tell). And even looking at the oxide home page, it's pretty big (but that isn't necessarily bad, there's a lot of information and there's also a design tradeoff between having multiple small pages and a few large ones). I think I've managed to get the Tribblix website adequately lightweight! -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------ illumos: illumos-discuss Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T88b01832bf8a9c2a-M1943c1d3b4e397383d9fac3d Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
