I'm really not sure where I stand on this one. But some food for thought: why back ourselves into a corner with conventions? Why not let context determine which approach to use?
Jeff On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:24:50, pauric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dont think that's ironic at all Bruce: "buttons for simple, finite > actions versus links for actions that begin a process or require > further detail." > > I agree with your definition whole heartedly. It follows the > existing conventions. Links are the prepositions and buttons are the > full-stop of interaction sentences. Links enable flow, buttons > commit. > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Posted from the new ixda.org > http://gamma.ixda.org/discuss?post=23139 > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* > February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA > Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ > > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
