> Are the people who are trying to maintain plausible deniability also going to
> claim that they never visit a news site?

Or use a PC at a library? Or a friend's house? Or AOL or some other
proxy server? Or prove in the negative that they didn't access what's
otherwise publicly available? Etc.

Just a couple of months ago it was given legal posture, for example,
that the simple act of making music files available for download
constituted copyright infringement. RIAA had built a lucrative legal
process of threats and shakedowns...until somebody challenged them:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9932004-7.html

There are no laws against suing ostriches.

-- 
Kontra
http://counternotions.com
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to