On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Shali Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I like the design... I mean, it's pretty and all. Google > does the whole "less is more" sort of deal and that tends to win > out. Agree.
> I think in this day and age, it is hard to get people to jump > on a new search engine just because people have adapted to what they > are used to... google or yahoo. Mostly google! Plus it is a little > confusing to say "cuil it!" It's not necessarily to think like this way, or google will not exist cause that time Yahoo is good ( but of cuz not good enough). Here i'm not say cuil is better, instead, just say that there's definitely could-be-(much?)-better for a search style than currently google, and this should be the designer's mind-set for it (or else why interaction design needed? :)) Cheers, -- Jarod -- Designing for better life style. http://jarodtang.spaces.live.com/ http://jarodtang.blogspot.com ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
