On 1 Sep 2009, at 21:31, Alok Jain wrote:
Git and svn are comparable but git is better in some respects , for
e.g. handling branches (i.e. if you are production version of the
code , and then you also are working on 1 or more new features. You
can keep one production branch and have another branch for other
features. This way if a hot fix is to be done to production then any
incomplete feature code does not come in the way.
[snip]
And git is worse in others (poor support on Windows boxes, lack of GUI
apps for those who like GUI apps, more complex command line UI, etc.)
[and you can also do branches with Subversion - but the tool support
for managing branches is better in git]
Cheers,
Adrian
--
http://quietstars.com - twitter.com/adrianh - delicious.com/adrianh
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
