On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Santosh <sant...@yahoo.com> wrote: In my opinion when you are writing a functional spec it should be > complimented atleast with a wireframe. This will set stage for designs which > can come a little later than the functional specs and the wireframes. >
Not sure of the above. If the wire frames and interactions are handled in the design document (which should be the case), I don't see the need for including including a wire frame in a functional spec. A functional spec is simply an inventory of tasks within specific modules. Designers have very little to contribute directly to a functional spec as these are owned by the product managers solely to communicate implementation requirements to the development team. I would not want any of my design artifacts to be used here. ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help