On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Santosh <sant...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In my opinion when you are writing a functional spec it should be
> complimented atleast with a wireframe. This will set stage for designs which
> can come a little later than the functional specs and the wireframes.
>

Not sure of the above. If the wire frames and interactions are handled in
the design document (which should be the case), I don't see the need for
including including a wire frame in a functional spec. A functional spec is
simply an inventory of tasks within specific modules. Designers have very
little to contribute directly to a functional spec as these are owned by the
product managers solely to communicate implementation requirements to the
development team. I would not want any of my design artifacts to be used
here.
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to