Jarod,

There are very good reasons why we don't encourage cross posting entire articles from the web. We have over 10,000 members. There are perhaps 100s of articles of interest to the IxD community posted every day. Imagine getting thousands of articles clogging up you inbox everyday. Snippets of articles with commentary and thoughtful reflection are great, but simply cross posting articles from the web would quickly get out of hand, clog our email servers, and ultimately hurt our community. It's really for the best.

Cheers,



~ will

"Where you innovate, how you innovate,
and what you innovate are design problems"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Evans | Director, Experience Design
tel: +1.617.281.1281 | w...@semanticfoundry.com
http://blog.semanticfoundry.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/semanticwill
aim: semanticwill
gtalk: semanticwill
twitter: semanticwill
skype: semanticwill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jarod Tang wrote:

Hi Will,
Thanks for you kindly notice ( and sorry for the cross posting).

And, let's step further by asking a designer's questioin, Is "Cross posting an article directly from a website" good for make life better or not?

 Cheers,
Jarod


On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Will Evans <w...@semanticfoundry.com> wrote:

Cross posting an article directly from a website is not really encouraged behavior.


~ will

"Where you innovate, how you innovate,
and what you innovate are design problems"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Evans | Director, Experience Design
tel: +1.617.281.1281 | w...@semanticfoundry.com
http://blog.semanticfoundry.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/semanticwill
aim: semanticwill
gtalk: semanticwill
twitter: semanticwill
skype: semanticwill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:09 PM, jtang wrote:

FYI

Sent to you by jtang via Google Reader: Facebook on Google Buzz: How
Well Does That Friendship Model Work? via ReadWriteWeb by Jolie O'Dell
on 2/9/10

While end users are eager to try out Google Buzz for themselves, many
of the Web's largest social properties have expressed a certain amount
of fear, uncertainty and doubt about the search giant's move into the
social space.

A Facebook rep said that the company is interested to see how Google's
latest product will make the Web more social and more open, but the
Facebook team has their concerns about whether Buzz's friendship model
is really all that functional. After a little bit of messing around
with the new product today, we can understand their point of view.

Sponsor

ReadWriteWeb's full coverage and analysis of Google Buzz:
"We're supportive of technologies that help make the web more social
and the world more open," a Facebook rep wrote to us today, "and we're
interested to see how Google Buzz progresses over time."

However, the Facebooker had words of warning about Buzz's hazy
friendship model.

To offer a brief explanation, Google has taken users' Gmail inboxes and
Google Talk IM contacts and programmatically tried to determine with
whom users communicate most frequently. Users can share Buzz posts with
the world (and Google search), or they can share privately through
their existing Gmail groups or custom-made groups in Buzz. For more
detail, take a look at this demo video:



Google Buzz seems to involve an asymmetric follower/friend model, but
we're not completely sure how friendships and shared posts will work.
As our Facebooker wrote, "The continued growth of the social web will
be determined by people and personal relationships. The people that you
email and chat with the most may not be your closest friends or the
people that you want to share and connect with."

We can definitely understand this point of view. Some folks rarely use
Gmail to communicate with their closest friends and family members
because they see them in person or use other networks to get in touch.
On the flip side of that coin, as more of us are using Gmail for work
communication, it might be irrelevant or overly personal to follow and
share with professional contacts.

All in all, one of our biggest concerns about Buzz adoption (being able
to play nicely with existing social apps) carries over into this part
of the conversation, as well: In addition to creating "best guesses"
for who to friend and follow using Gmail & Google Talk, why doesn't
Google simply use Twitter OAuth and Facebook Connect to import existing
friendships?

What do you think? Will Google Buzz's friendship model work? Or does
Facebook have a point about having carefully user-approved friendships
online?
Discuss


Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to ReadWriteWeb using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help




--
@jarodtang
http://designforuse.blogspot.com/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to