On 2013-06-24 at 21:58 -0400, Jesse Trucks wrote:
> The reality of spinning off another whole organization,

Then my request is entirely to determine what LOPSA can or can't do in
its current form.

(Lobbying for a charity whose exempt expenditures are under $500k
 appears to be capped to 20% of all expenditures, per
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4911 but again competent legal
 advice is needed, not my naive cherry-picking)

> We need to slow our membership churn, increase retention and growth,
> and finish paying off all external debt (which is just around the
> corner) before we can funnel money into any expensive programs, and we
> have very little expertise currently available to perform serious
> political work in any country, let alone many countries.
> 
> As much as many of us would love to get involved in the politics that
> affect our professional lives, it is extremely costly and time
> consuming to do so poorly, let alone to do it well.

See, this is why I would like LOPSA to determine what the legal limits
are, and also the practical limits.

If it is entirely legal, and will not endanger 501(c)3 status, for LOPSA
to retain a lawyer and publish analysis of acts that affect our
profession, then that might be the limit of what we do; members can use
that analysis and talk to their own local congresspersons about how
"hey, this new act is going to put me out of a job, and I'm in your
district" based on that analysis.  If the analysis is reputable, it can
carry weight.

If we can't directly lobby politicians and that's purely because of
financial constraints, that's good to know but if we know what we _can_
do, we can acknowledge those constraints and plan around them.  We can
know what's feasible and what isn't and be ready.  Folks on the relevant
board or committee can have reached out to groups like the EFF or ACLU
and gotten advice on when a lawyer might or might not be a good idea,
given finance, and might get recommendations on which lawyers to talk
to.

And if LOPSA can demonstrate that it's actually *DOING* something here,
trying to make a real world difference to the benefit of the members,
then it becomes realistic to hold out the hat and say "It's going to
cost $X00,000 to do this, can you contribute to the legal fund?" and
start to raise money *as soon as the legislation appears*, by being
ready to gear up and respond.

http://governance.lopsa.org/LOPSA_Bylaws#Purpose

Oh, and the byline at the top of the website <https://lopsa.org/>:

 "To advance the practice of system administration; to support,
  recognize, educate, and encourage its practitioners; and to serve the
  public through education and outreach on system administration issues."

I'd like the "through education and outreach on system administration
issues" to evolve beyond raising cheers for Sysadmin Appreciation Day
and be ready to provide education, through outreach, when we see
proposed legislation that might otherwise drive many of us to have to
change careers.

What can I do to help?

-Phil, US Person, GB citizen, sysadmin, crypto and security guy
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to