So the job market is hot hot hot again (at least out here in Silicon Valley / 
SF) and we’re back again to the days where “talented recruiters” contact me in 
spite of clear statements not to, and concerning jobs with zero match on my 
skillset. Their own job experience shows their last job was flipping 
hamburgers, their skill and ethics demonstrate the same.

Likewise when I am trying to fill roles, I get contacted by recruiters and then 
waste valuable hours only to learn that they are submitting resumes to me 
without having gotten permission from the person. Total ethics fail, and a huge 
waste of time. These recruiters can never represent us well to employers, and 
could never help us fill a role. I wish we had a blacklist so that we knew who 
to avoid. Since the obvious response is “patches welcome”, I’m going to create 
that patch.

I will shortly create a recruiter blacklist which I will maintain, but would 
happily turn over to a group who wants to take it on. Criteria for the list 
include:

1. Repeated contacts after being told to stop, or constant e-mail spam of job 
opportunities.

2. Contact through a mechanism where you indicate you don’t want to be 
contacted, e.g. LinkedIn profile that clearly indicates you won’t wish to be 
contacted about job offers.

3. Contact referencing a resume or posting which clearly indicates you don’t 
want to be contacted.

4. Situations where a recruiter put your resume forward to a job without your 
permission. This can cause an employer to reject you for an ethics violation 
that you didn’t not authorize.

Technical outputs of this blacklist which users can subscribe to would be:

1. Domain names

2. Mail servers by IPv4 and v6

3. Individual Names including LinkedIn, Google Plus, etc profiles

The first two would be available via DNS query, all of them would be available 
via HTTP REST interface or a web page where a search can be done.

Submissions would be accepted through the web page or via HTTP REST submission 
only. Contact information and documentation of the ethics failure would be 
required for validation, but available to and used by the maintainers of the 
list only and never shared with anyone.

I’d love to have some help with this. Respond to this message but drop the list 
if you’d like to work on this. I’ll post status updates about it on Twitter 
‘jorhett’ and http://www.netconsonance.com/ as I roll it out.

-- 
Jo Rhett
+1 (415) 999-1798
Skype: jorhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to