Can I just say *thank you* to Evan for his openness here! That’s leading by 
example… (and I agree with most if not all of his points, by the way…)

W.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Evan Pettrey
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 7:09 PM
To: Tom Limoncelli
Cc: Derek Balling; Lopsa Discussion
Subject: Re: [lopsa-discuss] Looking for an organizer for the first virtual 
LOPSA Chapter



On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Evan Pettrey 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Tom Limoncelli 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Derek Balling 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Essentially, I don't think I'm going to agree with you here, and I'm not sure 
there's a compromise position to be found, so diametrically opposed am I.

I can certainly be talked out of my position, Derek.  I even gave the 
parameters by which that is possible: Either show me how your alternative would 
solve problem A or B, or convince me that those 2 problems aren't intended to 
be solved by this project.

In fact, this thread has convinced me that LOPSA should have more discipline 
about making certain things members-only.  I hadn't thought of the mentee 
issue, and I'm glad to see they'll have to be members in the future.  The 
virtual chapter or periodic streaming speaker event, I agree there has to be 
some member-only-ness to it... I was pointing out that certain streaming 
services don't permit that (which doesn't have to be a barrier).

I don't think LOPSA will ever be the advocacy group I had hoped it would be, 
and I've come to terms with that (just recently... perhaps today).

I disagree with this. I don't think LOPSA is currently the advocacy group we'd 
all like to see it become. However, I believe provided the right leadership 
this is something within our reach. As a board member I've seen board members 
who got frustrated and failed to honor their commitment, board members who have 
contributed greatly and then lost steam (I believe I likely fall into this 
group), and others who have stayed the course and really made an impact.

I was going to communicate this message to the board privately at the end of my 
term in a few months but I think my desire to embrace openness suggests putting 
it out there for everybody to see may be more effective.


It will take a very strong (and committed) leader to fight through the 
indecisiveness and inaction we've seen within LOPSA for the past 9 years and 
bring the consensus necessary to start truly making a difference. However, I 
think that person is in our midst and I hope very much that we as a board (and 
an organization) take notice of this and give him the support he needs to 
become that leader. That isn't to say the other 7 of us on the board currently 
are not contributing, just that we're either too caught up in the details to 
see the forest for the trees or that we simply do not have the time necessary 
to devote to LOPSA. (The board member I'm referring to by the way is Matt 
Simmons...and no, this isn't a slight at the current administration, I'm simply 
looking to the future)


With that said, I think the key to LOPSA advancing as an organization begins 
with us at the board level but will take a large cast of supporting people to 
help us realize this ambition. The things I would love to see from LOPSA are:


  *   Embrace Openness - we need to do a better job as a board communicating 
with our members. Finances, board projects, problems we're facing, etc. 
Everything needs to be right out in the open for the world to see. Who/what 
exactly are we hiding from? Who are we protecting?
  *   An Eye on Education - Ski does a fantastic job with this, we (the 
membership and the board) really need to back him with these things as much as 
we possibly can. Better yet, provide him with a supporting cast!
  *   Seek Out Help - As sys admins it may not come naturally to us to find 
others to do things that we're capable of doing ourselves. However, this is the 
only way we're ever going to grow as an organization. Make open calls to our 
membership whenever and wherever we can for anything we're trying to advance!
  *   Move Forward - Get rid of the hideous website we've been bickering about 
for as long as I can remember. Dump (okay, continue to use but move beyond) IRC 
and begin embracing tools the next generation of sys admins will be using 
(whether that be Google Hangouts or something else, but I think Hangouts for 
now).
  *   Focus - Pick one or two projects at a time that we want to carry out and 
see them through to completion! We're entirely too consumed in the issue of the 
moment that we're not getting things done that we've identified as potential 
wins for the membership.
  *   Take a Stand - When things come up that are relevant to our industry we 
need to take a stand and make our voice be heard! We completely botched the 
Edward Snowden incident. We were so worried about upsetting one side or the 
other that we released a statement that effectively said nothing at all. 
Instead of picking a side on the morality of Snowden's actions vs. the 
government's actions we should have let it be down that it is a tragedy sys 
admins are thrust into these types of moral dilemmas to begin with (thanks Tom 
L for the perspective on this one).

Tom Limoncelli also generously offered to donate $500 to LOPSA every time LOPSA 
is mentioned in the NY Times (a line saying "yadda yadda yadda," Joe Smith, 
LOPSA Member, blah blah blah counts!). Let's make him regret ever making that 
promise!

There's one other that I forgot to add that needs to be mentioned:


  *   Be Flexible - I can't tell you how many great ideas I've seen killed by 
our rigorous adherence to bylaws that none of us created and procedure written 
by somebody none of us has ever met. Bylaws and procedure can be great and 
exist for a reason but we need to realize that often times we're sucking the 
soul out of projects that have a promising future simply because the idea 
wasn't presented correctly, the bylaws don't explicitly state something is 
allowable, etc.

We need to go back to operating like a startup. We're simply not a large enough 
organization to be held back by things like this.

That our strongest contributions to the membership seem to be our mailing lists 
and IRC tells me on thing for sure - currently the best thing about LOPSA is 
our community. We need to find more ways to give back to them.


 LOPSA is strongest on things like the irc channel, mailing lists, and other 
things and should emphasize them, stick with them, and grow by doing more of 
the things are like that.

Tom


--
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>    Work: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Skype: YesThatTom
Blog:  http://EverythingSysadmin.com

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to