With the response time discrepancy, I would think it's likely that the fast
response time on writes is due to caching.

You say that this is the only volume on the SAN seeing these times. I
assume that this is the only host accessing that LUN? Is that the only LUN
being accessed by this host?

--Matt

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Ski Kacoroski <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 09/16/2014 08:39 AM, Alan Robertson wrote:
>
>> On 09/16/2014 09:12 AM, Ski Kacoroski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We installed a new student records system over over the summer that
>>> runs on MS SQL server.  Everything seems to be ok, but for one thing
>>> that I am not sure is an issue waiting to bit me or something I can
>>> ignore.  On the SAN, the volume for the transaction logs has 125ms
>>> read response times (write response times are around 2ms).  This is
>>> the only volume on the SAN with such large response times.  Has anyone
>>> seen this before and if so, is it something I need to be concerned about.
>>>
>> Since write times are fast, then it's not likely a SAN congestion
>> issue.  Is the transaction log RAID5?  Are there rebuilds in progress?
>>
>> 125ms is really really slow.  It's about 10x slower than the real
>> underlying disk - including seek times.  Unless you have a rebuild
>> underway, it sounds broken to me.
>>
>> If you can afford it (and you probably can), I'd recommend RAID10 for
>> transaction logs - or even RAID1 SSD (even though it's pricey,
>> transaction logs aren't usually huge).
>>
>
> The disks are RAID1+0, 10k.  And yes I agree something is fishy here as
> this the only place I see the problem on the SAN.
>
> We are no where near the maximum IOPs on the array so that is not the
> problem.
>
> I am not sure about SAN disk alignment - I will check on this with the
> vendor.
>
> Thanks for all the replies.
>
> cheers,
>
> ski
>
> --
> "When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it
>   connected to the entire universe"            John Muir
>
> Chris "Ski" Kacoroski, [email protected], 206-501-9803
> or ski98033 on most IM services
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to