On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 11:37 PM Kristian Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gordan Bobic via discuss <[email protected]> writes: > > > FWIW, I am actively considering taking on post-EOL maintenance of > > 10.4.x and backporting applicable 10.5.x patches to it. Reason being > > performance anomalies similar to the ones you have bumped into. > > I think this is a good idea. > I also think the MariaDB Foundation could take a role in this.
Good luck with that... > I'll be happy to assist with the backporting of patches. > > I think the important thing will be to be quite restrictive about which > patches are back-ported. It should only be critical fixes, mostly security > fixes and regressions. There's usually a good argument for some person's > favorite patch to include, but the whole purpose of this will be to provide > a very stable branch, which is best facilitated by minimizing changes done. Well, I was thinking about backporting all applicable patches from 10.5.x after 10.5.25. Backporting CVEs only is obviously a much smaller task and there haven't been any fixed since 10.4.34 / 10.5.25, so if that's you're only concern, you are probably good to stick with 10.4.34 as things currently stand. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
