To the contrary... many new FOSS4g solutions have very easy to use GUI's. To name a few: QGIS, GVSIG, the latest GRASS effort, and MapWindow... - Dan
On 5/12/07, Tim Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Maué schrieb: > Hi Tim, > > I am not sure if using open source alternatives for education does > necessarily mean that your students learn more than just pressing > buttons in the right order. Actually, I guess this is one of the major > arguments against open source software: it's the lack of user-friendly > interfaces which forces you to learn the underlying concepts to let the > software make what you want. ... > choice to challenge of using GRASS instead of ArcDesktop. I would like > to see that (the mandatory) GIS classes should not force any student to > learn the functionality of a software package, wether it's free software > or not. I can second that. For a normal user a system should be as user friendly as possible. But, as you also state, GIS systems are expert software which require some sort of understanding of the concept. Not like read the manual and off you go. To my observation, FOSS-GIS differs a lot from the proprietary software. If you are interested in FOSS you'd usually go and learn it by yourself. And this is not done simply by reading one tutorial. When doing team work all others rely on the software that was thought and is present in the labs. And when you are short of time due to a coming deadline you may just stick to what you already know... But these issues are really educational matters that seem to be of more interest for the edu_discuss ML. I put this topic here becuase I am looking for a more general approach. Like I described I think that software can be learned once qualified teaching personel is there. Therefore I'd like to know if it would be feasible to implement a geodata infrastructure for a whole university like I described in my first posting. This would avoid buying tons of licences of a standard product. The money saved could be spend (A) on the real reseach (e.g. soil samples) or (B) to have a local GIS developer adjust and develop the software to the needs of the research groups which would then help others, too. I think FOSS GIS companies have already implemented geodata infrastructures in various organisations like governments or companies. Could the experiences gained on that field be transfered to the academia? For example: A guy from another department is now looking at introduce GIS in his department. What he does is checking how many licences of Arc* he could get for his budget. Maybe he would consider his decision if he'd knew that he what services (gdi implementation, adaption, training courses) he could get from a FOSS GIS service provider for the same budget. None of the responsible people will launch a tender that a FOSS and proprietary vendors apply and the best wins! ESRI is offering student licences (= Arc* for free during your thesis). So, students get a software which they know from classes and on which their supervisors have confidence. What has FOSS to offer? A lot of software with a superbe licence! But a very steep learning curve. To my thinking the GRASS flyer which is currently in development will not much. People who know linux or have advanced computing skills may give it a try (see above and previous posts). I can imagine that building up a mentoring network could help. Voluteering FOSS GIS gurus (in governmental authorities and companies) could mentor students or student groups that are interested. Some universities invite external experts to teach. Therefore I recommend to send a list of possible trainers in the specific country/region along when you start sending out flyers like the GRASS flyer. My university has not only fully equipped labs with Arc*. For remote sensing they rely (like many others) on the ITT stack (Envi, Idrisi, IDL). Once the licence is there it *has* to be used to justify the investment... And please remember that only a minority of users have high comutional skills. They have other things like in mind like getting samples from the fields, etc. (see Ari's mail). Kind regards, Tim _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Daniel P. Ames, PhD, PE Dept of Geosciences Idaho State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hydromap.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
