> Bruce > IMO: > > I'd caution against watering down the OSGeo 'brand' as a source of > 'quality' products, particularly if we want the products accepted as a > viable alternative within larger organisations.
> While it is good to provide pointers to projects of interest, there needs > to be a clear separation of what is an OSGeo project and what is not. I > think that it is acceptable to have certain hurdles that a project has to > pass in order to be accepted into the OSGeo fold. Could there be a series of tiers? The first tier could have a low barrier of entry, with low support provided, plus little-or-no promotion as being of the OSGeo 'brand'. A project could work its way through the tiers, and incidentally through the incubation process, and be rewarded with more support from OSGeo along the way. The final tier would include, amongst other things, recognition on the OSGeo home page. nick *********************************************************************** WARNING: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain legally privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print or copy this e-mail without appropriate authority. If this e-mail was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake, please telephone or e-mail me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of this e-mail and delete it and any copies of it from your computer system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this e-mail is not waived or destroyed by that mistake. It is your responsibility to ensure that this e-mail does not contain and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with your computer system). Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure. *********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
