On Wed, February 13, 2008 11:14, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > > >> IMHO, the limiting factor of the GFOSS is that there are tons of >> companies which are *exploiting* the GFOSS world itself, without giving >> anything or very little in return > > Agreed; I see this as a relevant problem. And yes, rules for providers > directory are a reasonable way to limit its negative consequences, both at > the international and at the national level (we have to work on this on > our GFOSS.it association). pc --
Please feel free to add your comments, there are several Wiki pages addressing this topic. There is the general introduction: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Service_Provider_Directory with some feedback: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Talk:Service_Provider_Directory and an effort to sort out how to prioritize: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/SPD_Prioritization Frank has already reported to the board at the last meeting and implementation is more or less under way. So if you have cool ideas, then now is the time to share them. Best regards, Arnulf. -- Arnulf Christl http://www.wheregroup.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
