I've not read the whole Wikipedia article, but the statement "images
have to be transformed from the RGB color space to another color space"
is indeed incorrect. Images that are 3-banded MAY be encoded with the
YCC transform, but this is not required; images with some other number
of bands do NOT undergo a color transform step.
If you're using ERMapper (ECW) files now, you're already deep into the
world of lossy transforms. Imagine files (.img) are lossless, I
believe, so you're safe there.
My offer to encode a few GB of sample data for you still holds :-)
-mpg
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] 'lossless' JPEG2000
IMO:
Michael,
Again, I don't pretend to be an expert on JPEG2000. However, I'd
like to know more about the format for future reference.
Does the wiki article at the following URL represent a good
overview of the format?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_2000
If it is accurate, there is a section that leads me to conclude
that the format is not suitable for a lot of remotely sensed spatial
imagery:
<snip> "Color components transformation
Initially, images have to be transformed from the RGB color
space <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_space> to another color
space, leading to three components that are handled separately. There
are two possible choices:..." </snip>
If this *is* the case, then I wouldn't be able to use the format
to store multi and hyper spectral imagery (ignoring other JP2 issues).
As to what format are we using currently: The source format
that the data came in with appropriate Geophysics, ERMapper and in some
cases Erdas Imagine conversions.
What are we using in the future: To be determined, probably a
database oriented solution.
As to data corruption: Many image processing algorithims and
processes result in data loss. The aim for most people is to understand
what is acceptable and to minimise the corruption of their data.
In our situation, some of the imagery may result from many
millions of dollars spent in capture and processing. Much of it is
irreplacable. All of it must be protected for future use.
Bruce
Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is
personal, confidential,
legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be
reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of
the copyright owner.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and
remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the
sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any
copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the
information contained in this email.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
