I just filled out the form on this Amazon page. This has been
previously discussed as a viable option for OAM.

Jeff

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Paul Ramsey <pram...@cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
> Amazon perhaps. Google might find it cuts a little too close to the
> bone. Chris, have you approached the AWS folks about hosting OAM? It's
> a little more involved than just data storage, they'd also need to
> provide a couple EC2 instances to receive and process the new data,
> but it would remove the hosting and scalability issues nicely.
>
> P.
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Joseph Gentle <jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If need be, I suspect both amazon and google would be happy to help
>> with hosting.
>>
>> http://aws.amazon.com/publicdatasets/
>>
>> -J
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Landon Blake <lbl...@ksninc.com> wrote:
>>> Frank wrote: "Clarifying such a matter is not trivial in an organization
>>> with many different ideas like OSGeo."
>>>
>>> Roger that. So I guess it boils down to the internal support for this
>>> type of service.
>>>
>>> Frank wrote: "I'm not sure if telascience accepts public donations or
>>> not, nor whether it is 501(c)3 which might matter for tax purposes."
>>>
>>> Roger that. I wonder if it would be possible to make a donation to
>>> telascience trough OSGeo, which would be tax deductible...
>>>
>>> Landon
>>> Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268
>>> Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
>>> [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
>>> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:53 PM
>>> To: OSGeo Discussions
>>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Relationship between Telascience and the
>>> OSGeo
>>>
>>> Landon Blake wrote:
>>>> Frank wrote: "In addition to the servers provided by Telascience we
>>> also
>>>> have two rented
>>>> servers at Peer1 (svn, trac, drupal, and mailman are on one of these
>>>> servers).
>>>> We are paying nearly $15K/yr for these two servers."
>>>>
>>>> Wow! Does our traffic require two dedicated servers like this?
>>>
>>> Landon,
>>>
>>> The arrangement at Peer1 was made primarily with the goal of having
>>> a reliable decent server able to support svn/trac and related project
>>> services.  The second server is primarily serving as a backup though
>>> the wiki is hosted there.
>>>
>>> We are contemplating dropping use of the second Peer1 server to save
>>> funds.
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote: " So far geospatial data hosting has been accomplished
>>> via
>>>> the servers at
>>>> Telascience.  OSGeo has not to-date provided any resources of it's own
>>>> (ie. budgeted for) in support of hosting geodata.
>>>>
>>>> Large scale geodata hosting is pretty demanding from a computational,
>>>> disk space and bandwidth point of view and it would be likely be
>>>> cost prohibitive for us to pursue it in a big way on commercially
>>>> priced servers like the ones at Peer1."
>>>>
>>>> Is it the space requirements that make geodata hosting demanding, the
>>>> bandwith requirements for download, or both?
>>>
>>> Both.  Bandwidth overages at Peer1 can mount up to be expensive very
>>> quickly, so we already host our most bandwidth intensive applications
>>> (download.osgeo.org and existing geodata services) at telascience.
>>>
>>> I'm presuming the hosted data would be made available as web services
>>> (WMS, WCS, etc) not just a download site.
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote: " There is some question in my mind just how central the
>>>> *hosting* of
>>>> free geodata is to our mission."
>>>>
>>>> It would be great to get this clarified.
>>>
>>> Clarifying such a matter is not trivial in an organization with
>>> many different ideas like OSGeo.
>>>
>>>> I had originally asked this question because I might be able to make a
>>>> small donation to support free geodata hosting. I was trying to figure
>>>> out which organization would be the best suited for the donation.
>>> Sounds
>>>> like it should go to telascience. We'll see how my taxes works out
>>> this
>>>> year. :]
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if telascience accepts public donations or not, nor whether
>>> it is 501(c)3 which might matter for tax purposes.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
>>> ------
>>> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
>>> warmer...@pobox.com
>>> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>>> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> Warning:
>>> Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects 
>>> including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the 
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
>>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If 
>>> you have received this information in error, please notify the sender 
>>> immediately.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to