We used a static FCGI specification FastCgiServer /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv.fcgi -processes 8 -initial_env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/opt/build/instant_client_11_1/lib:/opt/build /arcsde_c_sdk/lib
Mike -- Michael Smith RSGIS Center US Army Corps of Engineers w: (603) 646-4765 On 10/24/09 6:36 PM, "Guillaume Sueur" <no-re...@neogeo-online.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for publishing this test for people who couldn't make it to > Sydney. I would be interested in getting the Fcgi configuration of > Mapserver in Apache. Any chance to get that ? > > Regards > > Guillaume > > Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 10:39 +1100, Jeff McKenna a écrit : >> For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS Performance >> Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer): >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout >> >> MapServer: power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map >> draws should >> take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in >> the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising). >> >> All: a lot of credit should go to Andrea Aime from GeoServer who worked >> very hard in bringing the MapServer team up to speed to learn the >> testing process. It was a great experience and we're already looking >> forward to next year. >> >> -jeff >> >> >> -- >> Jeff McKenna >> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mapserver-users mailing list >> mapserver-us...@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss