i still have a gap in my mind about how to make a program for both :0 i will play around with both first, and will reply shortly
F On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch> wrote: > Hei Frans, > > could you outline in more detail what you are aiming to do? > I.e. what the students (after training) and the software (to be programmed) > should be able to do? > If it is about web mapping then you may consider a whole different range of > FOSS4GIS. > > stefan > > Frans Thamura wrote: >> >> thx for the nice reply . >> >> >> i have work with our goverment spatial division, teaching java, and >> they are 100% blank in development, this is a transformation program >> from a division to create map become a services entity -> >> www.bakosutranal.go.id >> >> i am also teaching highschool develop apps on Java, and we success >> create web java programmer in architectural mode, and they will get >> schoolarship to university, mostly they are poor and smart, and >> several dont have computer, and several never visit Jakarta (they >> families never visit Jakarta).. >> >> my idea to help them to the level that they can provide solution. >> >> Landon, ur reply sound that using Geotools API will harder for them? >> is that right? >> >> i am still working for both to find the best one >> >> >> hope my reply can link our problem. we have human resource and bad >> education program in this country, so may be our student different >> with people outside this country >> >> F >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Landon Blake <lbl...@ksninc.com> wrote: >>> >>> Frans, >>> >>> I will try to provide an intelligent answer to your question based on my >>> own experience. >>> >>> Here is my observation of the main difference between Deegree and >>> Geotools: >>> >>> Degree seems to be a more closely knit group of developers, coming from >>> just a couple of organizations, while Geotools draws developers from all >>> over the place. >>> >>> This has some different implications for users of the libraries and for >>> developers. >>> >>> I find the Deegree API is often easier to use but not as well >>> documented. The Geotools API is better documented but much more >>> complicated. I think this extra complication in Geotools stems from its >>> efforts to please such a diverse group. >>> >>> I have contributed a single "unsupported" module to Geotools. This >>> process wasn't too burdensome, and I found a couple of the programmers >>> in Geotools were a delight to work with. I also learned a lot from my >>> very limited work on Geotools. I typically work on code that plugs into >>> a single program, and participation in Geotools requires you to write >>> code that can be used in all sorts of programs. You need a different >>> type of thinking to do that. >>> >>> The programmers from Deegree were also very responsive on their mailing >>> list. >>> >>> Deegree uses a feature model somewhat similar to JUMP's. I find the >>> Geotools feature model is very hard to learn and work with. >>> >>> I hope that helps. >>> >>> Landon >>> Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268 >>> Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658 >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >>> [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frans Thamura >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:30 AM >>> To: OSGeo Discussions >>> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Degree vs GeoTools API >>> >>> hi all >>> >>> anyone can share the difference between Deegree vs GeoTools API >>> >>> thx >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Frans Thamura >>> Meruvian. >>> Experiential Tempation of Java and Enterprise OpenSource >>> >>> Meruvian jTechnopreneur Program (S1) telah hadir, Dapatkan benefit >>> bagi SMK yang melakukan mapping SKKD, dg program beasiswa dari >>> Gunadarma >>> >>> Mobile: +6287885901958 >>> Blog & Profile: http://frans.thamura.info >>> >>> We provide services to migrate your apps to Java (web), in amazing >>> fast and reliable. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >>> Warning: >>> Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against >>> defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not >>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, >>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this information in error, please notify the sender >>> immediately. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss