Hey Jody, all,
congratulations to all of you on the ongoing work on geotools, glad to
see the project chugging along with all your laughter, sweat, and tears.
GeoTools 8, hein? Well the '2' was always a pain so it sounds wonderful
to get rid of it...
ciao,
~adrian
On 04/11/2011 02:17 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
New blog post up with the details:
http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2011/04/geotools-8.html
A couple supporting links:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Skip+GeoTools+3
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/conventions/version.html
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/release.html
With this in place the project will follow a traditional
<Major>.<Minor>.<Patch> release number; essentially dropping the "2"
from "GeoTools 2".
Thanks to Joachim Van der Auwera from the Geomajas project who's
questions on the user list lead to this change in policy. A reminder
that the GeoTools proposal process is open to all, often proposals need
to be back up by effort; but we do run an open project :-)
If you are using 2.8-SNAPSHOT (and why wouldn't you it helps us get
early feedback :-) ) please update by changing over to 8-SNAPSHOT:
| <properties>
<geotools.version>8-SNAPSHOT</geotools.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.geotools</groupId>
<artifactId>gt-main</artifactId>
<version>${geotools.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.geotools</groupId>
<artifactId>gt-epsg-hsql</artifactId>
<version>${geotools.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>|
--
Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
