Michael, On 2012/05/05 23:58, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
Your points have actually been discussed, but so far there hasn't apparently been enough interest to further push the idea of stronger charter member roles.
"enough interest" in the community or the OSGeo Board?
(Your points (1) and (3) are already the case, and some people (myself included) feel that (2) is not desirable right now.)
About (2), why is it not desirable? Venka
-mpg From: board-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:board-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:46 AM Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org; OSGeo-Board; marketing Subject: [Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role There was a discussion about responsibility of Charter members http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2011-December/009239.html and a wiki page (see below) was initiated (at the request of a Board member) but not much input after that. http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_charter_member_page_instruction I also made several suggestions to the board which till date is answered by anyone on the OSGeo board. See thread http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2012-January/009337.html Venka
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
