On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:27 AM, "Seven (aka Arnulf)" <se...@arnulf.us> wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel <tech_...@wildintellect.com> wrote: >>> This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also >>> appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and >>> I'm also sure many of us can name firms that have no issue shipping LGPL >>> components. >> >> GPL is dying, of natural causes. >> >> http://ostatic.com/blog/the-top-licenses-on-github >> >> Best regards, > > (I don't think that GPL is dying, it is still 70% on SourceForge last > time I checked) > .. would also be interesting to rearrange that chart by -- - SLOC. Would 200 projects of 5 SLOC each under license "A" vs. one project of 1000 SLOC under license "B" considered some kind of marker? - adoption. Would 200 projects under license "A" adopted by a total of 500 implementations vs. one project under license "B" adopted by 500,000 folks portend some other kind of trend? Yes, an interesting and worthwhile conversation. -- Puneet Kishor _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss