Il 04/05/2013 18:43, Adrian Custer ha scritto: > > Which brings us to OSGeo and what useful contribution it could make to > the debate. Simply rehashing the issues above is not going to be useful > to anyone. If new ideas arise, or a large, common position emerges on > the issue, I'd be glad to inject them into the OGC discussion. > > I suspect there is at least a week before voting resumes, although the > rules going forwards are not yet clear.
Adrian, your overview is very helpful. From where I stand, there are three reasons to push for a "no" to the proposed standard, all touched in your or Cameron's message: 1. disrespect for an existing, widespread, appreciated standard: GeoJSON 2. no open source reference implementation 3. vote was already suspended multiple times, showing a lack of agreement about this standard Points 1 and 2 are part of the OSGeo mission IMHO. Thank you steko -- Stefano Costa http://steko.iosa.it/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss