-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 22/09/2013 10:41, Daniel Morissette ha scritto:
> Personally I'd treat OSGeo4W as a software project, with a PSC, > committers, etc. We should do the same with OSGeo-Live actually, > take it out of the Marketing committee and treat it as a sofware > project which is what it si really is. > > Then projects (OSGeo4W and OSGeo-Live) can apply for incubation > when they are resdy, etc. Hi Daniel, I see two possibilities here: * osgeo4w is an official foundation project, and as such it does not need to apply for incubation (it would be circular reasoning); in this case the PSC should be appointed by the foundation, or * it is an independent project, thus following the usual procedure; in this case, better not to use the osgeo4w name and logo, and let the devs self organize. Thoughts? All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJAWYEACgkQ/NedwLUzIr5mowCfR7mK5Pc4ilRIiDFcNeVhoXg6 P1AAnjXOOrS223GxtOajjoxdARUD0h1M =qzGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
