-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 23/09/2013 20:46, Cameron Shorter ha scritto:
> From what I can gather from the outside, it seems osgeo4w's primary > requirement is a > 1+ dedicated developer(s) who will drive the core functions of the project. > Namely, > setting a release schedule, chasing developers for contributions, triaging > bug lists, > etc. This can be done with or without a PSC or official OSGeo endorsement. I slightly disagree with this: what we mainly need IMHO is a clear direction, and therefore a mechanism to take decisions (e.g. the approach from Tamas is quite interesting, and different from the current one; Mateusz has suggested an alternative route; etc.). When there is a reliable roadmap, I think resources (time~money) can be found from our Windows user base. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJAmBgACgkQ/NedwLUzIr6pfACghf3NAyZ9w65RK0Z4PiABGSXq rvIAoKFcVKa4ffcsyhk1f63oNPzRAfxT =lMIR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
