Correct: “membership”, by design at the original founding meeting, was designed not to confer ANY rights or distinguishing properties except for the ability to vote for board members.
While the election process is pretty messy right now, I view that as a solvable problem: I’m still at a loss to understand why we’d want to change anything more than that. -mpg On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:58 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeld...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I have understood this procedure correctly: > > The board is voted for by the Charter Members, new Charter Members are > proposed and voted for by the existing Charter Members, there may be a limit > placed on the number of new Charter Members set by the board. > > Membership of OSGeo does not seem to confer any rights on the member. > > Do we need to review our foundation docs to find a more inclusive procedure? > ____________ > Steven Feldman >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
