Acronyms don’t usually include prepositions, at least in English. Including 2 and 4 is definitely computerese, something that helps separate words that can’t have spaces between them as in command-line Unix, e.g. shp2kml. But I don’t see a need for it here, especially if we want to reach out to nontechnical groups.
No matter what the acronym won’t translate into other languages. SLFAG, anyone? — Andy On Oct 6, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Dan Ames <dan.a...@byu.edu<mailto:dan.a...@byu.edu>> wrote: +1 4 this comment: "a cool thing 2 do ten years ago" Actually from an international point of view - and as OSGeo grows - I would think that the 4 in FOSS4G raises more questions than answers since the number 4 and the word "for" are only homonyms in English as far as I know. The German words für and vier don't sound much a like and neither do the Dutch words voor and vier. And those are probably the closest matches. So maybe it's a bit Anglo-centric to 4ce the 4 on people. For example, "for" in Japanese, ための, sounds nothing at all like "4" in Japanese which to me sounds like "yum". Similarly, I doubt the Chinese pet shop, "52 Pets" would internationalize very well. By the way, does anyone know why 6 was afraid of 7? I suspect a lot of people don't, just like I had no idea why my Thai colleague kept texting me 555... But FOSS4G is an established brand now and brands are hard to build and keep. So +1 for pressing forward with FOSS-yum-G...? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:24 AM Randal Hale <rjh...@northrivergeographic.com<mailto:rjh...@northrivergeographic.com>> wrote: I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. I will bring some fuel - diesel in honor of the largest car manufacturing plant near me (Volkswagen) It would strengthen the brand of OSGEO with a conference named the same. There seems to be a fairly large disconnect right now with the FOSS4GNA conference and OSGEO. That needs to be much tighter. Although I'm a bit of a stickler with Free and Open Source - I like the idea of going OSGeo - because that's what I do (at least in my case) - I use GIS and I do it with free and open source tools. +11 on having to explain foss4g and then dragging osgeo into it. Lets go one step further and talk to the Geo4all folks into saying osgeo4all. Randy On 10/06/2015 11:12 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote: Okay, this is probably sticking a match under a pile of dry wood but here goes... Can we rename The FOSS4G Conference to The OSGeo Conference? Cons: 1. FOSS4G is an established brand 2. FOSS4G sidesteps the "Free" vs "Open Source" argument by including both. Counters to those: 1. Really? Perhaps amongst OSGeo people, but outside our sphere I have to expand the acronym and then go on to mention OSGeo. 2. Let's have that argument somewhere else, okay? Pros: 1. Puts the *Geo* visible, not tucked away as a G at the end. 2. Gets rid of the "4G", which may have been a cool thing 2 do ten years ago, but not now :) 3. Removes any confusion with 4G telecoms networks. 4. Clearly brands the conference as an OSGeo conference. Recent discussion about the prominence and significance of OSGeo to FOSS4G becomes moot. 5. Is easy to explain. The OSGeo Conference is the open source geospatial conference. See the OSGeo web site. Search for OSGeo. One acronym to remember. [I toyed with the idea that the conference should be called "OSGeo Live!" and renaming the OSGeo Live operating system disc as "OSGeoOS" but that might be a bit too much :)] So, this is the discuss list, discuss. Barry _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- ----------------- Randal Hale North River Geographic Systems, Inc http://www.northrivergeographic.com<http://www.northrivergeographic.com/> 423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com<mailto:rjh...@northrivergeographic.com> twitter:rjhale http://about.me/rjhale http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis Southeast OSGEO: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Southeast_US _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
